Enseñando español desde 1989

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these systems. Out of lie diagnosis tools examined at the border to a program for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being utilised in asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their very own capacity to steer these systems and to follow their right for safeguard.

It also illustrates how these kinds of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from being able to access the channels of coverage. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who all are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: when they assistance to expedite the asylum procedure, they also help to make it difficult to get refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental celebrities, and find more ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *